4.6 Article

Severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and risk for cardiovascular disease: A study of a cohort of 14,000 mutation carriers

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 233, Issue 1, Pages 219-223

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.12.020

Keywords

Familial hypercholesterolemia; Cardiovascular disease; Severe familial hypercholesterolemia; Prevalence

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [91612122]
  2. Netherland Heart Foundation (NHS) [2010T082]
  3. Aegerion
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Cerenis
  7. Eli Lilly
  8. Genzyme
  9. JSiS
  10. MSD
  11. Novartis
  12. Pfizer
  13. Regeneron
  14. Roche
  15. Sanofi
  16. Amgen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Some recently emerged lipid-lowering therapies are currently restricted to patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), and studies are underway to also assess these therapies in patients with 'severe heterozygous FH (HeFH)'. However, no uniform definition of 'severe HeFH' exists, although untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels above 8 mmol/L (309 mg/dl) have been historically used to define this phenotype. Our aim was to define severe HeFH, to establish its prevalence and CVD risk, and to study the relative contribution of classical risk factors to CVD risk in HeFH patients. Methods and results: We analysed a cohort of 14,283 patients with molecularly defined HeFH, identified by the national FH screening programme in the Netherlands. Age and gender specific percentiles of untreated LDL-C were determined. The percentile corresponding to an LDL-C level of 8 mmol/L (309 mg/dL) in men aged 36-40 years (90th percentile) was selected as the cut-off value for severe HeFH. By applying this percentile-criterion to the whole cohort, 11% of the HeFH patients could be considered as having severe HeFH. Combined with an estimated HeFH prevalence of 1: 300 in the Netherlands, this would translate into a prevalence of approximately 1: 3,000 for severe HeFH. CVD risk was significantly increased in severe HeFH patients compared to non-severe HeFH patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.05-1.51], p = 0.015). In line, male gender, increased age, increased BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, high LDL-C and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were independent CVD risk factors in HeFH per se. Conclusions: We changed the commonly used static LDL-C level of 8 mmol/L for the identification of severe HeFH into an age and gender corrected percentile. This definition would theoretically result in a prevalence of 1:3,000 for severe HeFH. Patients with severe HeFH are at increased CVD risk compared to non-severe HeFH patients, which underscores the need for more aggressive LDL-C lowering these patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available