4.6 Article

Lack of causal relationship between leukocyte telomere length and coronary heart disease

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 233, Issue 2, Pages 375-380

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.01.008

Keywords

Telomere length; TERC; Coronary heart disease; Risk assessment

Funding

  1. National 973 projects [2012CB518004, 2012CB517801]
  2. 863 project [2012AA02A510]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81100066]
  4. Key Project of Health Ministry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the association between genetic variation in telomerase RNA component (TERC) and leukocyte telomere length (LTL) with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods and results: An analysis of LTL was conducted, focusing on two SNPs in 2 community-based cohort populations comprising 3500 Chinese Han individuals. In addition, LTL ratio was determined in a case-control setting involving 4351 participants: 2211 healthy individuals and 2140 CHD patients. The association between LTL and the presence and extent of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular lesions were tested. Results confirmed the association of rs12696304 and rs16847897 with LTL in the Chinese Han population (P = 1.63 x 10(-6) and P = 1.44 x 10(-7), respectively). However, these SNPs confer a moderate risk for CHD but did not achieve significant threshold after multiple corrections. Decreased LTL ratio was associated with CHD (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.34; P < 0.01). In addition, the LTL ratio in CHD patients was related to numbers of vascular disease lesions. Conclusions: Our results do not support a causal role of LTL for the development of CHD. However, LTL may be related to complex conditions associated with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease manifestations. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available