4.6 Article

Difference of ruptured plaque morphology between asymptomatic coronary artery disease and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: An optical coherence tomography study

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 235, Issue 2, Pages 532-537

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.05.920

Keywords

Silent plaque rupture; Optical coherence tomography; Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Autopsy studies have reported that rupture of a thin-cap fibroatheroma and subsequent thrombus formation is the major mechanism leading to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it is not clear why only some plaque ruptures lead to ACS. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution imaging modality which is capable of investigating detailed coronary plaque morphology in vivo. The objective of this study was to determine whether ruptured plaque morphology assessed by OCT differs between asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). Methods: We examined ruptured plaque morphology using OCT in 80 patients, 33 with asymptomatic CAD and 47 with NSTEACS. Results: The frequency of lipid-rich plaque and intracoronary thrombus was significantly lower in asymptomatic CAD than in NSTEACS (61% vs. 85%, p = 0.013 and 9% vs. 83%, p < 0.001, respectively). Although maximal ruptured cavity cross-sectional area (CSA) was similar in both groups, lumen area at the rupture site and minimal lumen area were significantly larger in asymptomatic CAD than in NSTEACS (3.78 +/- 1.50 mm(2) vs. 2.70 +/- 1.55 mm(2), p = 0.003 and 2.75 +/- 0.99 mm(2) vs. 1.72 +/- 0.90 mm(2), p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: OCT revealed that the morphology of ruptured plaques differs between asymptomatic CAD and NSTEACS in terms of lumen area and the frequency of lipid-rich plaques and thrombi. These morphological features may be associated with the clinical presentation of CAD. c 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available