4.7 Article

The difluoromethylenesulfonic acid group as a monoanionic phosphate surrogate for obtaining PTP1B inhibitors

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 2309-2323

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00062-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three peptides, 7-9, bearing sulfono(difluoromethyl)phenylalanine (F(2)Smp,2), a nonhydrolyzable, monoanionic phosphotyrosine mimetic, were prepared and evaluated as PTP1B inhibitors. The most effective inhibitor was the nonapeptide. ELEF(F(2)Smp)MDYE-NH2. (9) which exhibited a K-i of 360 nM. A comparison of F-2-Smp-bearing peptides 7 [DADE(F(2)Smp)LNH2. K-i=3.4 muM] and 8 [EEDE(F(2)Smp)LNH2. K-i=0.74 muM] with their phosphono(difluoromethyl)phenylalanine (F(2)Pmp)-bearing analogues indicated that F(2)Smp is not as effective a pTyr mimetic as F(2)Pmp by 100- to 130-fold. Although F(2)Smp is not as effective as F(2)Pmp, a comparison of peptide 7 with analagous peptides bearing other monoanionic pTyr mimetics recently reported in the literature indicates that F(2)Smp is about 65-fold more effective than any other non-hydrolyzable, monanionic pTyr mimetic reported to date. To further assess the difluoromethylenesulfonic acid (DFMS) group as a monoanionic phosphate mimetic, a series of 24 nonpeptidyl biaryl compounds bearing the DFMS group were prepared using polymer-supported methodologies and screened for PTP 1B inhibition. Several of these compounds were selected for further study and their IC50's compared to their difluoromethylenephosphonic (DFMP) analogues. The differences in IC50's between the DFMS and DFMP non-peptidyl compounds was not as great as with the F(2)Smp- and F(2)Pmp-bearing peptides. Possible reasons for this and its implication to the design of small molecule PTP1B inhibitors is discussed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available