4.6 Article

The shared allelic architecture of adiponectin levels and coronary artery disease

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 229, Issue 1, Pages 145-148

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.03.034

Keywords

Adiponectin; Coronary artery disease; Atherosclerosis; Gene; Association; SNP

Funding

  1. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec
  4. Lady Davis Institute
  5. Jewish General Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: A large body of epidemiologic data strongly suggests an association between excess adiposity and coronary artery disease (CAD). Low adiponectin levels, a hormone secreted only from adipocytes, have been associated with an increased risk of CAD in observational studies. However, these associations cannot clarify whether this relationship is causal or due to a shared set of causal factors or even confounding. Genome-wide association studies have identified common variants that influence adiponectin levels, providing valuable tools to examine the genetic relationship between adiponectin and CAD. Methods: Using 145 genome wide significant SNPs for adiponectin from the ADIPOGen consortium (n = 49,891), we tested whether adiponectin-decreasing alleles influenced risk of CAD in the CARDIoGRAM consortium (n = 85,274). Results: In single-SNP analysis, 5 variants among 145 SNPs were associated with increased risk of CAD after correcting for multiple testing (P < 4.4 x 10(-4)). Using a multi-SNP genotypic risk score to test whether adiponectin levels and CAD have a shared genetic etiology, we found that adiponectin-decreasing alleles increased risk of CAD (P = 5.4 x 10(-7)). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that adiponectin levels and CAD have a shared allelic architecture and provide rationale to undertake a Mendelian randomization studies to understand if this relationship is causal. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available