4.3 Article

Darusentan:: An effective endothelinA receptor antagonist for treatment of hypertension

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 583-589

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(02)02933-3

Keywords

endothelin receptor antagonist; darusentan; hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of darusentan, a new selective endothelin(A) antagonist was investigated. Methods: In a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-response study, a 2-week placebo run-in period was followed by a 6-week treatment period and then a 2-week placebo withdrawal period. At baseline before darusentan therapy, the average blood pressure (BP) of the patient population studied was diastolic 103.49 (SD 3.55) and systolic 168.27 (SD 16.63) mm Hg. In total, 392 patients were randomized (darusentan 10 mg: 94 patients, 30 mg: 103 patients, 100 mg: 96 patients, placebo: 99 patients). Results: Darusentan significantly reduced diastolic (mean difference to placebo: 10 mg: -3.7 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (Cl): -6.6, -0.9. P = .009; 30 mg: -4.9 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.7. -2.2. P = .0005: 100 mg: -8.3 mm Hg, 95% Cl: -11.1, -5.5, P = .0001) and systolic BP (mean difference to placebo: 10 mg: -6.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: -11.0, -0.9, P = .02; 30 mg: -7.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -12.3, -2.4, P = .004, 100 mg: -11.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -16.3. -6.2, P = .0001). Pulse rate remained unchanged in all groups. There was a trend toward more adverse events in the active treatment groups (placebo: 30.3%, 10 mg: 44.7%. 30 mg: 40.8%. 100 mg: 49.0%). Headache was the most commonly reported adverse event, with no relevant difference among treatments. Flushing and peripheral edema were seen in a dose-dependent fashion in the active treatment groups only. Conclusion: These data, the first, suggest the therapeutic benefit of selective endothelin(A) receptor antagonism in human hypertension. (C) 2002 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available