4.6 Article

A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 523-536

Publisher

AMER ORTHOPAEDIC SOC SPORT MED
DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300041201

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The choice of graft material for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is believed to play a major role in outcome, but most comparisons of graft choice have not been well controlled. Hypothesis: The choice of graft material (patellar tendon or hamstring tendon) does affect clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Prospective, nontrandomized clinical trial. Methods: Two groups of 90 patients each were followed for a minimum of 5 years. Results: International Knee Documentation Committee assessment revealed that more than 85% of each group had an overall score of A or B at all follow-up intervals. The median Lysholm knee score was greater than 90 for both groups at 2 and 5 years. Instrumented testing revealed no significant difference between the two groups beyond 3 years. Thirty-one percent of the patellar tendon group (25) had a fixed flexion deformity and 19% of the hamstring tendon group (14) had fixed flexion deformity at 5 years. Radiologic assessment revealed early osteoarthritic changes in 4% of the hamstring tendon group (2) and in 18% of the patellar tendon group (11) at 5 years. Conclusions: Arthroscopic reconstruction with either graft results in a similar surgical outcome, reliably restoring knee stability over a 5-year period; however, patients with patellar tendon grafts are at greater risk of developing early signs of osteoarthritis. (C) 2002 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available