4.6 Review

Depression as a predictor for coronary heart disease - A review and meta-analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 51-61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00439-7

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; depressive disorder; cohort studies; myocardial infarction; prospective studies; psychology; social

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [2-T32-HL 07365] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To review and quantify the impact of depression on the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) in initially healthy subjects. Data sources: Cohort studies on depression and CHD were searched in MEDLINE (1966-2000) and PSYCHINFO (1887-2000), bibliographies, expert consultation, and personal reference files. Data selection: Cohort studies with clinical depression or depressive mood as the exposure, and myocardial infarction or coronary death as the outcome. Data extraction: Information on study design, sample size and characteristics, assessment of depression, outcome, number of cases, crude and most-adjusted relative risks, and variables used in multivariate adjustments were abstracted. Data synthesis: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall relative risk [RR] for the development of CHD in depressed subjects was 1.64 (95% confidence interval [Cl]=1.29-2.08, p<0.001). A sensitivity analysis showed that clinical depression (RR=2.69, 95% CI=1.63-4.43, p<0.001) was a stronger predictor than depressive mood (RR=1.49, 95% CI=1.16-1.92, p=0.02). Conclusion: It is concluded that depression predicts the development of CHD in initially healthy people. The stronger effect size for clinical depression compared to depressive mood points out that there might be a dose-response relationship between depression and CHD. Implications of the findings for a broader bio-psycho-social framework are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available