4.7 Article

Validity of self-reporting of episodes of external genital warts

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 39-45

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/340743

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [5-MO1-RR-00722] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [T32-AI07481, UO1-AI-35040, UO1-AI-37613, UO1-AI-35043, UO1-AI-35042, UO1-AI-37984, UO1-AI-35041, UO1-AI-35039] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [P-30-MH58107] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine whether men are able to self-diagnose external genital warts (EGWs), we studied data from 1115 men with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. Men were largely unable to accurately assess the presence of EGWs. Self-reporting of EGWs was not a sensitive tool; only 38% of men who had EGWs diagnosed by a trained examiner who used bright light and visual inspection also reported having them. When we controlled for other covariates in a multivariate model, men who had EGWs diagnosed by an examiner were 14 times less likely to show concordance between examiner findings and self-report than were men who did not have EGWs diagnosed by an examiner (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.09). Self-diagnosis and self-assessment may not accurately reflect the presence of EGWs, and self-diagnosis should not be used in place of an examiner's findings for epidemiologic studies that seek to determine the cause of disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available