4.5 Article

Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: Implications for cochlear prostheses

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages 247-258

Publisher

ACOUSTICAL SOC AMER AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1121/1.1487843

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [F32 DC000470, F32 DC00470, R01 DC03808, R01 DC003808, T32 DC000011, T32 DC00011] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tone languages differ from English in that the pitch pattern of a single-syllable word conveys lexical meaning. In the present study, dependence of tonal-speech perception on features of the stimulation was examined using an acoustic simulation of a CIS-type speech-processing strategy for cochlear prostheses. Contributions of spectral features of the speech signals were assessed by varying the number of filter bands, while contributions of temporal envelope features were assessed by varying the low-pass cutoff frequency used for extracting the amplitude envelopes. Ten normal-hearing native Mandarin Chinese speakers were tested. When the low-pass cutoff frequency was fixed at 512 Hz, consonant, vowel, and sentence recognition improved as a function of the number of channels and reached plateau at 4 to 6 channels. Subjective judgments of sound quality continued to improve as the number of channels increased to 12, the highest number tested. Tone recognition, i.e., recognition of the four Mandarin tone patterns, depended on both the number of channels and the low-pass cutoff frequency. The trade-off between the temporal and spectral cues for tone recognition indicates that temporal cues can compensate for diminished spectral cues for tone recognition and vice versa. An additional tone recognition experiment using syllables of equal duration showed a marked decrease in performance, indicating that duration cues contribute to Lone recognition. A third experiment showed that recognition of processed FM patterns that mimic Mandarin tone patterns was poor when temporal envelope and duration cues were removed. (C) 2002 Acoustical Society of America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available