4.6 Article

Smoking, smoking cessation and aortic arch calcification in older Chinese: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 202, Issue 2, Pages 529-534

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.03.004

Keywords

Smoking; Smoking cessation; Aortic arch calcification; Chinese

Funding

  1. The University of Hong Kong Foundation for Educational Development and Research, Hong Kong
  2. the Guangzhou Public Health Bureau
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau, Guangzhou, China
  4. The University of Birmingham, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To study the association between smoking, smoking cessation and aortic arc calcification (AAC) in an older Chinese population. Methods: A total of 3022 men and 7279 women aged 50-85 years were recruited and received a medical check-up including measurement of fasting plasma vascular risk factors. Two radiologists reviewed the posterior-anterior plain chest X-ray radiographs and assessed AAC together. Information on smoking status, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors was collected. Results: The crude prevalence of AAC in men (38.58%) was lower than that in women (41.37%). The adjusted odds ratios of AAC increased significantly across never, ex- and current smokers in both genders. Dose-response relationships were observed among current smokers for smoking amount (cigarettes/day), smoking duration (years) and cigarette pack-years in both genders (all p<0.01). The odds ratios decreased significantly (p=0.018) with longer duration of quitting in light ex-smoking then (<23.5 pack-years) but showed no beneficial effect (p=0.72) for heavy ex-smokers (>23.5 pack-years). Conclusion: Smoking increased the risk of AAC in Chinese, while smoking cessation decreased the risk only in male light ex-smokers. Chest X-ray is a cheap and simple method to detect AAC, which should be an important warning signal for immediate smoking cessation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available