4.6 Article

Phosphorus levels are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in the general population

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 199, Issue 2, Pages 424-431

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.11.004

Keywords

atherosclerosis; carotid intima-media thickness; phosphorus

Funding

  1. NHLBI
  2. ARIC Study Investigators

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Elevated serum phosphorus has been linked to mortality among patients with renal failure and in one study in the general population. The aim of our study was to examine the association of serum phosphorus level with carotid atherosclerosis in the general population. Methods: We determined the association of serum phosphorus levels with carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in 13.340 subjects 45-64 years old without known coronary heart disease, stroke, or renal disease from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Results: Phosphorus levels were significantly associated with age, female gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and fibrinogen levels (p<0.0001 for each), but not with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Age- and sex-adjusted mean cIMT ranged from 0.718 to 0.736 mm for the lowest to the highest quintile of serum phosphorus (p-value for trend <0.0001). This relationship was attenuated but remianed statistically significant after adjustment for atherosclerotic risk factors and eGFR (trend p<0.0001) in men but not in women. In a multivariable model, a one standard deviation increase in baseline serum phosphorus (0.48 mg/dL) was associated with a 0.012 mm increase in mean cIMT (p<0.007) in men. Conclusion: In a population-based cohort of subjects free of overt cardiovascular and renal disease serum phosphorus was positively associated with cIMT independent of traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis and eGFR in men but not in women. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available