4.6 Article

Expression of the cysteine protease legumain in vascular lesions and functional implications in atherogenesis

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 201, Issue 1, Pages 53-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.01.016

Keywords

Cysteine protease; Legumain; Atherosclerosis; Macrophages; Microarray analysis; Chemotaxis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The present study was conducted to characterize the expression of the cysteine protease legumain in murine and human atherosclerotic tissues, and to explore the molecular mechanisms by which legumain may contribute to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Methods and results: Using microarray analysis, legumain mRNA expression was found to increase with development of atherosclerosis in the aorta of aging Apolipoprotein E deficient mice while expression remained at low level and unchanged in arteries of age-matched C57BL/6 control mice. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis determined that legumain was predominantly expressed by macrophages in the atherosclerotic aorta, in lesions at the aortic sinus and in injured carotid arteries of Apolipoprotein E deficient mice as well as in inflamed areas in advanced human coronary atherosclerotic plaques. fit vitro, M-CSF differentiated human primary macrophages were shown to express legumain and the protein could also be detected in the culture media. When tested in migration assays, legumain induced chemotaxis of primary human monocytes and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Conclusions: Legumain is expressed in both murine and human atherosclerotic lesions. The macrophage-specific expression Of legumain in vivo and ability of legumain to induce chemotaxis of monocytes and endothelial cells in vitro suggest that legumain may play a functional role in atherogenesis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available