4.5 Article

Regulation of interstitial excitatory amino acid concentrations after cortical contusion injury

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 943, Issue 1, Pages 15-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02471-X

Keywords

brain microdialysis; glucose; glutamate; traumatic brain injury

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [P50 NS30318] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increases in brain interstitial excitatory amino acid (EAA(1)) concentrations after ischemia are ameliorated by use-dependent Na+ channel antagonists and by supplementing interstitial glucose, but the regulation of EAA(1) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown. We studied the regulation of EAA(1), after TBI using the controlled cortical impact model in rats. To monitor changes in EAA(1), microdialysis probes were placed in the cortex adjacent to the contusion and in the ipsilateral hippocampus. Significant increases in dialysate EAA, after TBI were found compared to levels measured in sham controls. Treatment with the use-dependent Na+ channel antagonist 619C89 (30 mg/kg i.v.) did not significantly decrease dialysate glutamate compared to vehicle controls in hippocampus (10.4 +/- 2.4 vs. 11.9 +/- 1.6 muM), but there was significant decrease in dialysate glutamate in cortex after 619C89 treatment (19.3 +/- 3 vs. 12.6 +/- 1.1 muM, P<0.05). Addition of 30 mM glucose to the dialysate, a treatment that decreases EAA(1) after ischemia, had no significant effect upon dialysate glutamate after TBI in cortex (20.0 +/- 4.9 vs. 11.7 +/- 3.4 mu M) or in hippocampus (10.9 +/- 2.0 vs. 8.9 +/- 2.4 mu M). These results suggest that neither increased release of EAAs due to Na+ channel-mediated depolarization nor failure of glutamate reuptake due to glucose deprivation can explain the majority of the increase in EAA(1) following TBI. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available