4.5 Article

Modulation by hyperpolarization-activated cationic currents of voltage responses in human rods

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 943, Issue 1, Pages 48-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02531-3

Keywords

patch-clamp; retinal cell; rod; inner segment; retinal detachment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used the whole-cell patch-clamp recording technique on surgically excised human retina to examine whether human rod photoreceptors express hyperpolarization-activated cationic currents (I-h) and to analyze the effects of I-h on rod's voltage responses. Hyperpolarizing voltage steps from a holding potential of -60 mV evoked a slow inward-rectifying current in both rods in retinal slices and isolated rods. The slow inward-rectifying currents induced by hyperpolarization were markedly reduced by 3 mM Cs+ (a blocker of I-h) in the bath, but not by 3 mM Ba2+ (an anomalous rectifier K+ current blocker) or 1 mM SITS (a Cl- current blocker). A concentration-response curve for block by Cs+ of the inward currents could be fitted by the Hill equation with a half-blocking concentration (IC50) of 41 muM and a Hill coefficient of 0.91. The time course of the inward current activation was well described at all recorded voltages by the sum of two exponentials. Under current-clamp conditions, injection of steps of current, either hyperpolarizing or depolarizing, elicited an initial rapid voltage change that was followed by a gradual decay in the voltage response. The decay in the voltage responses was eliminated by bath application of 3 mM Cs+. The voltage dependence, pharmacology, and kinetics of the slow inward-rectifying currents described above suggest that human rods express I-h. We suggest that I-h becomes activated in the course of large hyperpolarizations generated by bright-light illumination and may modify the waveform of the photovoltage in human rods. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available