4.0 Article

Obesity is a risk factor for dyspnea but not for airflow obstruction

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 162, Issue 13, Pages 1477-1481

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.13.1477

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous research suggests that obesity is an important risk factor for asthma. However, since obesity can cause dyspnea through mechanisms other than airflow obstruction, diagnostic misclassification of asthma could partially account for this association. Objective: To determine whether there is a relationship between obesity and airflow obstruction. Methods: A total of 16171 participants (17 years or older) from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 111) were divided into 5 quintiles based on their body mass index (BMI) to determine the association between BMI quintile and risk of self-reported asthma, bronchodilator use, exercise performance, and airflow obstruction. Significant airflow obstruction was defined as a ratio less than 80% the predicted value of forced expiratory volume in I second to forced vital capacity adjusted for age, sex, and race. Results: The highest BMI quintile (ie, the most obese participants) had the greatest risk of self-reported asthma (odds ratio [OR], 1.50 95% confidence interval [01, 1.24-1.81), bronchodilator use (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.38-2.72), and dyspnea with exertion (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.35-3.00). Paradoxically, the highest BMI quintile had the lowest risk for significant airflow obstruction (P = .001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that while obesity is a risk factor for self-reported asthma, obese participants are at a lower risk for (objective) airflow obstruction. Many more obese than nonobese participants were using bronchodilators despite a lack of objective evidence for airflow obstruction. These data suggest that mechanisms other than airflow obstruction are responsible for dyspnea genesis in obesity and that asthma might be over-diagnosed in the obese population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available