4.6 Article

Relationship between CT anthropometric measurements, adipokines and abdominal aortic calcification

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 197, Issue 1, Pages 428-434

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.06.027

Keywords

aortic calcification; obesity; computer tomography; visceral

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL080010-01, R01 HL080010-03, R01 HL080010] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Visceral obesity and aortic calcification are both associated with cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to examine if visceral obesity was associated with the severity of abdominal aortic calcification. Methods: One hundred and forty eight patients with peripheral artery disease were assessed by CT angiography. The severity of infrarenal abdominal aortic calcification was measured using a validated technique. The size of the visceral and subcutaneous compartments was estimated from anthropometric measurements made from the same CT. Calcification and anthropometric measurements were compared with Spearman's correlation and multiple logistic regression (adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, smoking and cholesterol). Results: The relative size of the visceral compartment estimated from CT diameter ratios was correlated with abdominal aortic calcification severity, r = 0.27, p = 0.001 and independently associated with calcification allowing for other cardiovascular risk factors (OR 6.63, 95% CI 1.90-23.14). The relative size of the visceral compartment was associated with serum osteoprotegerin levels, suggesting a possible mechanism underlying the detrimental influence of visceral adiposity. Conclusion: The association of visceral adiposity and arterial calcification suggests one mechanism, which may contribute to the detrimental effects of central obesity. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available