4.7 Article

Contribution of APOE promoter polymorphisms to Alzheimer's disease risk

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 59-66

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.59.1.59

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG05681, AG16208, AG03991] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether the effects of APOE promoter polymorphisms on AD are independent of the APOE-epsilon4 allele. Background: Recently, the -491 A-->T and -219 G-->T polymorphisms located in the APOE promoter have been suggested to be risk factors for AD. However, the effects of these polymorphisms have not always been reproduced in case-control studies, possibly because of the strong linkage disequilibrium existing at this locus or the characteristics of the populations studied. Methods: Data collection was performed from six independent samples (1,732 patients with AD and 1,926 control subjects) genotyped for APOE exon 4 and the two APOE promoter polymorphisms. The risks associated with the APOE polymorphisms for developing AD were estimated using logistic regression procedures and calculation of odds ratios with 95% CI adjusted by age, sex, and collection center. Independence of the APOE promoter polymorphisms was tested by stratification for APOE-epsilon4 and tertile design was used for age stratification. Results: The independence of the -491 AA genotype was observed in the whole sample whereas the independence of the -219 TT genotype was observed only in the oldest population. Conclusion: The -491 and -219 APOE promoter polymorphisms incur risk for AD in addition to risk associated with the APOE-epsilon4 allele, with age accentuating the effect of the -219 TT genotype. Because these polymorphisms appear to influence apoE levels, these results suggest that APOE expression is an important determinant of AD pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available