4.7 Article

The new TNM classification of lymph node metastasis minimises stage migration problems in gastric cancer patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 171-174

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600432

Keywords

gastric cancer; TNM-UICC classification; lymph node metastasis; stage migration; Will Rogers phenomenon

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aimed at investigating whether in gastric cancer patients stage migration occurs with extension of lymphadenectomy, when node metastases are staged according to the new pN classification (UICC 1997). The Investigation involved 92 1 patients, who underwent RO gastric resection for gastric cancer between 1988 and 1998 in three different Italian centres: Verona (n=236), Forli (n=409), Siena (n=276). The relation among lymphadenectomy and pN category was assessed by Kendall's partial rank-order correlation coefficient, controlling for depth of tumour invasion. A direct evaluation of the Will Rogers phenomenon was accomplished In the Verona series, by comparing the number of positive nodes actually observed with the number of positive nodes which would have been retrieved by a less extended lymphadenectomy (D 1). The number of positive nodes increased remarkably with the enlargement of lymphadenectomy, especially In pT2 patients (from 2.2 +/- 3,9 in D1 to 3.9 +/- 5.0 in D3) and in pT3/p74 patients (from 5.1 +/- 5,9 in D I to 11.3 +/- 12.6 in D3). Non-parametric statistics highlighted a weak (Kendall's partial T=0.128) but significant (P < 0.001) correlation between pN category and extension of lymphadenectomy, In the direct analysis of the Verona series, 22 patients out of 230 (9.6%) migrated to a lower pN tier when ignoring positive nodes retrieved from the second and third level. This percentage increased to 39.1% (90 out of 230) when adopting the TNM 87 classification, In conclusion stage migration is of minor importance in gastric cancer patients, staged according to the new pN classification.(C) 2002 Cancer Research UK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available