4.7 Article

Myocardial contraction fraction: A volumetric index of myocardial shortening by freehand three-dimensional echocardiography

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 325-329

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01944-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study sought to evaluate myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) as an index of myocardial shortening by comparison to conventional shortening indices in patients with hypertensive hypertrophy, athletes with physiologic hypertrophy and sedentary normal adult subjects. Background A significant percentage of patients with hypertensive hypertrophy have normal or preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function by conventional echocardiographic measures whereas their systolic function is depressed when measured by the two-dimensional echocardiographic mid-wall shortening fraction (MWSF). A three-dimensional echocardiographic measure of myocardial shortening analogous to MWSF has been lacking. We describe a volumetric measure of myocardial shortening, the MCF, as the ratio of stroke volume (SV) to myocardial volume (MV), and hypothesize that it may be useful to compare myocardial performance in patients with different degrees and types of hypertrophy. Methods We compared the MCF using freehand three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the LV to conventional measures of LV function (election fraction [EF], endocardial shortening fraction [SF] and MWSF) in subjects with pathologic hypertensive hypertrophy, heart failure symptoms and preserved EF (n=17), athletes with physiologic hypertrophy (n=41) and normal sedentary adults (n=80). Results The EF was in the normal range for all three groups. The MCF was lower in hypertensive hypertrophy compared with normal subjects (0.33+/-0.05 vs. 0.44+/-0.07, p<0.01). It also successfully differentiated physiologic hypertrophy from normal subjects (0.50±0.05 vs. 0.44±0.07, p<0.01). The endocardial SF did not distinguish athletes from normal subjects and the MWSF did not distinguish hypertensive from physiologic hypertrophy. Conclusions The MCF, a volumetric measure of myocardial shortening, demonstrates that myocardial shortening is decreased in hypertensive hypertrophy and increased in physiologic hypertrophy. The MCF may be useful in assessing differences in myocardial performance in patients with similar degrees of hypertrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available