4.6 Article

Mismatch repair in human nuclear extracts - Quantitative analyses of excision of nicked circular mismatched DNA substrates, constructed by a new technique employing synthetic oligonucleotides

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 277, Issue 29, Pages 26136-26142

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M200357200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES09848] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mammalian mismatch repair (MMR) systems respond to broad ranges of DNA mismatches and lesions. Kinetic analyses of MMR processing in vitro have focused on base mismatches in a few sequence contexts, because of a lack of general and quantitative MMR assays and because of the difficulty of constructing a multiplicity of MMR substrates, particularly those with DNA lesions. We describe here simple and efficient construction of 11 different MMR substrates, by ligating synthetic oligomers into gapped plasmids generated using sequence-specific N.BstNBI nicking endonuclease, then using sequence-specific nicking endonuclease N.AlwI to introduce single nicks for initiation of 3' to 5' or 5' to 3' excision. To quantitatively assay MMR excision gaps in base-mispaired substrates, generated in human nuclear extracts lacking exogenous dNTPs, we used position- and strand-specific oligomer probes. Mispair-provoked excision along the shorter path from the pre-existing nick toward the mismatch, either 3' to 5' or 5' to T, predominated over longer path excision by roughly 10:1 to 20:1. MMR excision was complete within 7 min, was highly specific (90:1) for the nicked strand, and was strongly mispair-dependent (at least 40:1). Nonspecific (mismatch-independent) 5' to 3' excision was considerably greater than nonspecific 3' to 5' excision, especially at pre-existing gaps, but was not processive. These techniques can be used to construct and analyze MMR substrates with DNA mismatches or lesions in any sequence context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available