4.7 Article

The intracellular translocation of the components of the fibroblast growth factor 1 release complex precedes their assembly prior to export

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 158, Issue 2, Pages 201-208

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200203084

Keywords

fibroblast growth factor; heat shock; S100A13; Synaptotagmin1; confocal microscopy

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 15555, P20 RR015555] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 35627, R01 HL035627] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [AG 07450] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The release of signal peptideless proteins occurs through nonclassical export pathways and the release of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)1 in response to cellular stress is well documented. Although biochemical evidence suggests that the formation of a multiprotein complex containing S100A13 and Synaptotagmin (Syt)1 is important for the release of FGF1, it is unclear where this intracellular complex is assembled. As a result, we employed real-time analysis using confocal fluorescence microscopy to study the spatio-temporal aspects of this nonclassical export pathway and demonstrate that heat shock stimulates the redistribution of FCF1 from a diffuse cytosolic pattern to a locale near the inner surface of the plasma membrane where it colocalized with S100A13 and Syt1. In addition, coexpression of dominant-negative mutant forms of S100A13 and Syt1, which both repress the release of FGF1, failed to inhibit the stress-induced peripheral redistribution of intracellular FGF1. However, amlexanox, a compound that is known to attenuate actin stress fiber formation and FGF1 release, was able to repress this process. These data suggest that the assembly of the intracellular complex involved in the release of FGF1 occurs near the inner surface of the plasma membrane and is dependent on the F-actin cytoskeleton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available