4.7 Article

Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 288, Issue 4, Pages 462-467

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.4.462

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Landmark clinical trials have demonstrated the survival benefits of statins, with benefits usually starting after 1 to 2 years of treatment. Research prior to these trials of older lipid-lowering agents demonstrated low levels of 1-year adherence. Objective To compare 2-year adherence following statin initiation in 3 cohorts of patients: those with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS), those with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD), and those without coronary disease (primary prevention). Design and Setting Cohort study using linked population-based administrative data from Ontario. Patients All patients aged 66 years or older who received at least 1 statin prescription between January 1994 and December 1998 and who did not have a statin prescription in the prior year were followed up for 2 years from their first statin prescription. There were 22379 patients in the ACS, 36106 in the chronic CAD, and 85020 in the primary prevention cohorts. Main Outcome Measures Adherence to statins, defined as a statin being dispensed at least every 120 days after the index prescription for 2 years. Results Two-year adherence rates in the cohorts were only 40.1% for ACS, 36.1% for chronic CAD, and 25.4% for primary prevention. Relative to the ACS cohort, nonadherence was more likely among patients receiving statins in the chronic CAD (relative risk ERR], 1.14; 95% Cl, 1,11-1.16) and primary prevention cohorts (RR, 1,92; 95% Cl, 1.87-1.96). Conclusions Elderly patients with and without recent ACS have low rates of adherence to statins. This suggests that many patients initiating statin therapy may receive no or limited benefit from statins because of premature discontinuation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available