4.8 Article

Deletion of functional gastrin gene markedly increases colon carcinogenesis in response to azoxymethane in mice

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages 516-530

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.34754

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA72992, CA60087] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: We recently reported that transgenic mice overexpressing progastrin were at a higher risk for developing colon cancers in response to azoxymethane (AOM), whereas mice overexpressing gastrin-17 were at a reduced risk. To examine further the role of gastrins in colon carcinogenesis, we generated gastrin gene knockout mice (GAS-KO). Methods: The height and proliferative index (PI) of colonic crypts were similar in GAS-KO and wild-type (WT) mice, suggesting that the absence of gastrins in GAS-KO mice did not significantly affect the growth of colonic mucosa. GAS-KO and WT mice were treated with AOM for 3-4 weeks; control mice received saline. Results: Colonic proliferation in response to AOM was significantly increased in GAS-KO vs. WT mice. Aberrant crypt foci (ACFs) were similarly increased significantly by similar to2-5-fold in GAS-KO vs. WT mice after 2 weeks of AOM treatment. Female GAS-KO mice developed adenomas (Ads) and adenocarcinomas (AdCAs) at earlier times (similar to10 months) than the male GAS-KO mice and the male and female WT mice (similar to12 months). The total numbers of Ads and AdCAs were significantly higher in GAS-KO than in WT mice. Conclusions: These results suggest the novel possibility that loss of gastrin expression (and hence amidated gastrins) significantly increases susceptibility to colon carcinogenesis in response to AM Previous studies with FVB/N transgenic mice similarly suggested a protective role of amidated gastrins against colon carcinogenesis, which supports the present findings of an increase in colon carcinogenesis in GAS-KO mice lacking normal physiological levels of amidated gastrins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available