4.8 Article

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies from coeliac patients inhibit transglutaminase activity both in vitro and in situ

Journal

GUT
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 177-181

Publisher

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.51.2.177

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Telethon [E.1141] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Coeliac disease (CD) is a multifactorial disorder which has an autoimmune component characterised by the occurrence of disease specific autoreactive antibodies against the enzyme tissue transglutaminase (tTG). The aim of this study was to investigate whether binding of antibodies to the enzyme influences tTG activity. Methods: tTG activity was assayed in the presence of immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) purified from the serum of coeliac patients, CUB 7402 (an anti-tTG mouse monoclonal antibody), and human anti-tTG monoclonal antibodies derived from both intestinal lymphocytes from three patients with CID and from peripheral blood lymphocytes from healthy subjects. For our studies we used calcium treated and untreated recombinant human tTG. Furthermore, the effects of antibodies were determined by immunohistochemical detection of tTG activity in sections of human umbilical cord. Results: IgG and IgA from CID patients inhibited tTG activity in vitro in a dose dependent manner, with, a different rate of inhibition among patients. The monoclonal antibody CUB 7402 and human mono, clonal antibodies displayed a dose dependent inhibitory effect towards the catalytic activity of the enzyme, both in vitro and in situ. Preincubation of tTG with CaCl2 caused loss of the inhibitory effect due to CUB 7402 but not that caused by human monoclonal antibodies. Conclusions: Purified CID IgA, IgG, as well as human anti-tTG monoclonal antibodies inhibited the enzymatic activity of human tTG both in vitro and in situ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available