4.3 Article

A statistical study of the subsurface structure and eruptivity of solar active regions

Journal

ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 352, Issue 2, Pages 361-371

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-014-1931-x

Keywords

Sun: corona; Sun: coronal mass ejections; Sun: flares; Sun: helioseismology; Sun: magnetic fields; Sun: active regions; Sun: sunspots

Funding

  1. NSC of ROC [NSC99-2112-M-008-019-MY3, NSC102-2112-M-008-018]
  2. MOE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A statistical study of 77 solar active regions (ARs) is conducted to investigate the existence of identifiable correlations between the subsurface structural disturbances and the activity level of the active regions. The disturbances examined in this study are aOE (c)|delta I (1)/I (1)|>, aOE (c)|delta c (2)/c (2)|>, and aOE (c)|delta c (2)/c (2)-delta I (1)/I (1)|>, where I (1) and c are the thermodynamic properties of first adiabatic index and sound speed modified by magnetic field, respectively. The averages are over three depth layers: 0.975-0.98R (aS (TM)), 0.98-0.99R (aS (TM)) and 0.99-0.995R (aS (TM)) to represent the structural disturbances in that layer. The level of the surface magnetic activity is measured by the Magnetic Activity Index (MAI) of active region and the relative and absolute MAI differences (rdMAI and dMAI) between the active and quiet regions. The eruptivity of each active region is quantified by its Flare Index, total number of coronal mass ejections (CMEs), and total kinetic energy of the CMEs. The existence and level of the correlations are evaluated by scatter plots and correlation coefficients. No definitive correlation can be claimed from the results. While a weak positive trend is visible between dMAI and aOE (c)|delta I (1)/I (1)|> and aOE (c)|delta c (2)/c (2)|> in the layer 0.975-0.98R (aS (TM)), their correlation levels, being approximately 0.6, are not sufficiently high to justify the correlation. Some subsurface disturbances are seen to increase with eruptivity indices among ARs with high eruptivity. The statistical significance of such trend, however, cannot be ascertained due to the small number of very eruptive ARs in our sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available