4.4 Article

Effectiveness of capillary electrophoresis using fluorescent-labeled primers in detecting T-cell receptor γ gene rearrangements

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 137-143

Publisher

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60694-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe the use of fluorescent-labeled primers to analyze T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangements (TCRgammaGR) using capillary electrophoresis in the ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer. We also compare die performance with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). in a single multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) we amplified TCRgammaGR with primers for all known groups of variable region genes, and joining region genes described in lymphoid neoplasms. Ten reactive samples, followed by five cell lines and 25 tumor samples with 41 individual TCRgammaGR (due to many biallelic rearrangements) previously identified by DGGE, were analyzed to validate the technique. The capillary electrophoresis. protocol has 92% concordance for both TCR clonal status (23 of 25) and 95% concordance in the number of individual TCRgammaGR (38 of 41) identified by DGGE. The reproducible sensitivity for detecting TCRgammaGR diluted in reactive lymphoid DNA is 2% in clinical applications. Discrimination of predominant rearrangements requires a minimum ratio of two times the height of the normal distribution of polyclonal peaks. Capillary electrophoresis can provide results within 60 minutes for each specimen after PCR is complete. Capillary electrophoresis provides a faster result than sequence-based separation methods and gives an archival electronic record. Fluorescent labeling allows the identification of both the variable and joining gene segments used in a TCRgammaGR. The effectiveness of capillary electrophoresis is similar to DGGE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available