4.6 Article

The diversity of Phaseolus-nodulating rhizobial populations is altered by liming of acid soils planted with Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Brazil

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 8, Pages 4025-4034

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.4025-4034.2002

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PCR-mediated restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA internally transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the 16S rRNA gene indicated that the rhizobial populations isolated from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) nodules in the unlimed soil from a series of five lime rates applied 6 years previously to plots of an acidic oxisol had less diversity than those from plots with higher rates of liming. Isolates affiliated with Rhizobium tropici IIB and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli were predominant independent of lime application. An index of richness based on the number of ITS groups increased from 2.2 to 5.7 along the soil liming gradient, and the richness index based on species types determined by RFLP analysis of the 16S rRNA gene varied from 0.5 to 1.4. The Shannon index of diversity, based on the number of ITS groups, increased from 1.8 in unlimed soil to 2.8 in limed soil, and, based on RFLP analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, ranged from 0.9 to 1.4. In the limed soil, the subpopulation of R. tropici 1113 pattern types contained the largest number of ITS groups. In contrast, there were more R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli types in the unlimed soil with the lowest pH than in soils with the highest pH. The number of ITS (strain) groups within R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli did not change with increased abundance of rhizobia in the soil, while with R. tropici IIB, the number of strain groups increased significantly. Some cultural and biochemical characteristics of Phaseolus-nodulating isolates were significantly related to changes in soil properties caused by liming, largely due to changes in the predominance of the rhizobial species groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available