4.2 Article

NK cells become Ki-67+in MLC and expand depending on the lack of ligand for KIR on stimulator cells in IL-2 supplemented MLC

Journal

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 8, Pages 638-646

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0198-8859(02)00420-2

Keywords

cellular immunology; alloreactivity; NK cells; killer inhibitory receptors; mixed lymphocyte culture

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mixed lymphocyte Culture (MLC) response was measured with the use of Ki-67 monoclonal antibody and responding cells were verified by CD3 and CD56 surface markers staining. Stimulator cells were discriminated from responder cells on the basis of forward and side scatter. Allogeneic, but nor autologous MLC had Ki-67+ responder cells in lymphocyte gate at the end of the culture. In allogeneic MLC T cells and natural killer (NK) cells were in a similar proportion Ki-67+ (mean +/- SD: 59.25% +/- 9.72% versus 61.75% +/- 13.2%). Ki-67+ NK cells had higher CD56 mean fluorescence intensity than those lacking Ki-67 (745 +/- 357 versus 196 +/- 56 P < 0.0001). NK cells contribution to responding lymphocytes was positively correlated with the percentage of Ki67+ cells in NK population by the end of the Culture (r = 0.74, p = 0.002). NK cells response in MLC increased upon supplementation of the Culture medium with human recombintant interleukin-2 (IL-2). Responder cells from single individual were tested with 8 Bw4+ and 8 Bw4- as well as with 9 CNK1+ and 9 CNK1- stimulators. In IL-2 Supplemented MLC killer inhibitory receptor expressing cells expanded when ligands for this receptor were absent in Stimulating population. Consequently, stimulator cells lacking Bw4 promoted NKB1+ cells expansion (7.2 % +/- 3% versus 3.6% +/- 1%, P = 0.0031), whereas HLA-C NK1 negative stimulators promoted CD158a+ cells expansion (9.6% +/- 4.8% versus 6% +/- 2.6%, p = 0.0385). (C) American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, 2002. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available