4.7 Article

Improvement of hybrid yield by advanced backcross QTL analysis in elite maize

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
Volume 105, Issue 2-3, Pages 440-448

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-002-0945-x

Keywords

maize; advanced backcross-QTL analysis; grain yield; spatial analysis; heartbreaker miniature inverted transposable elements

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We applied an advanced backcross breeding strategy to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) of agronomic importance in a cross between two elite inbreds of maize, RD6502 (Mol7-type recurrent parent) and RD3013 (Iodent donor parent). Two hundred and four BC2 families were scored at 106 SSR, 15 AFLP, and 38 Heartbreaker (MITE) loci. BC2 testcrosses (TC) with B73 were phenotyped at six locations in the Midwest and N.Y. We detected four grain yield, six grain moisture, and three plant height QTLs at which the RD3013 allele had a favorable effect (p < 0.05). All four yield QTLs were selected as target introgressions in the development of BC3TC families. As predicted by BC2TC analysis, BC3TC entries containing introgressions at yld3.1 and yld10.1 significantly outperformed non-carrier entries by 11.1% (15.6 bu/A at one location) and 6.7% (7.1 bu/A averaged across two locations), respectively, in replicated Midwestern trials (p < 0.05). Detection of yld10.1 effects in the BC2TC by spatial analysis (i.e., incomplete block, response surface, autoregressive, moving average or autoregressive moving average), but not by conventional single point analysis or interval mapping, indicated the utility of local environmental control for QTL mapping in unreplicated maize progeny. This work demonstrated that the advanced backcross QTL method can be applied to identify and manipulate useful QTLs in heterotic inbreds of elite maize. Genetic gains by this approach can be coupled with the maintenance and selection of favorable epistatic gene complexes by traditional hybrid breeding for maize improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available