4.6 Article

Cryptococcaemia: clinical features and prognostic factors

Journal

QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages 511-518

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/95.8.511

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Limited data are available on the clinical significance of cryptococcaemia, which occurs in 10- 30% of patients with cryptococcal diseases. Aim: To describe the clinical features of cryptococcaemia and identify its prognostic factors. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: All adult patients with Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from blood culture at the National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, 1981- 2001, were included. Demographic and clinical information was obtained from medical records. Results: Fifty- two patients were diagnosed and treated for cryptococcaemia. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (24/ 52, 46%), immunosuppressive therapy (12/ 52, 23%) and decompensated liver cirrhosis (11/ 52, 21%) were the three major predisposing conditions. Forty- two patients (81%, n = 52) had sepsis, including four patients with septic shock, when blood cultures were obtained. Of the 38 patients in whom lumbar puncture was done, cerebrospinal fluid culture showed meningeal involvement in 32 (84%). The 30- day fatality rate was 37%. Liver cirrhosis, septic shock at presentation, an initial APACHE II score greater than or equal to20, age 060 years and female gender were associated with mortality under univariate analysis. Starting antifungal therapy within 48 h after blood culture was associated with improved survival. Under multivariate analysis, liver cirrhosis remained a strong independent predictor of mortality at 30 days after blood culture (HR 16.3, 95% CI 2.6- 101.7, p = 0.003). Discussion: Patients with cryptococcaemia have a high risk of mortality within 30 days. Sepsis and meningeal involvement are common. Those with liver cirrhosis have a particularly poor prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available