4.2 Article

Influence of the lateral ventricles and irregular skull base on brain kinematics due to sagittal plane head rotation

Journal

Publisher

ASME-AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENG
DOI: 10.1115/1.1485752

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-dimensional physical models of the human head were used to investigate how the lateral ventricles and irregular skull base influence kinematics in the medial brain during sagittal angular head dynamics. Silicone gel simulated the brain and was separated from the surrounding skull vessel by paraffin that provided a slip interface between the gel and vessel. A humanlike skull base model (HSB) included a,surrogate skull base mimicking the irregular geometry of the human. An HSBV model added an elliptical inclusion filled with liquid paraffin simulating the lateral ventricles to the HSB model. A simplified skull base model (SSBV) included ventricle substitute but approximated the anterior and middle cranial fossae by a flat and slightly angled surface. The models were exposed to 7600 rad/s(2) peak angular acceleration with 6 ins pulse duration and 5 deg (breed rotation. After 90 deg free rotation, the models were decelerated during 30 ms. Rigid body displacement, shear strain and principal strains were determined from high-speed video recorded trajectories of grid markers in the surrogate brains. Peak values of inferior brain surface displacement and strains were ill) to 10.9X (times) and 3.3X higher in SSBV than in HSBV Peak strain was up to 2.7X higher in HSB than in HSBV The results indicate that the irregular skull base protects nerves and vessels passing through the cranial floor by reducing brain displacement and that the intraventricular cerebrospinal fluid relieves strain in regions inferior and superior- to the ventricles. The ventricles and irregular skull base are necessary in modeling head impact and understanding brain injury mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available