4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 196-200

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10139

Keywords

diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; prostate; tumor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To measure for the first time the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in anatomical regions of the prostate for normal and patient groups, and to investigate its use as a differentiating parameter between healthy and malignant tissue within the patient group. Materials and Methods: Single-shot diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging (DW-EPI) was used to measure the ADC in the prostate in normal (N = 7) and patient (N = 19) groups. The spin-echo images comprised 96 X 96 pixels (field of view of 16 cm, TR/TE = 4000/120 msec) with six b-factor values ranging from 64 to 786 seconds/mm(2). Results: The ADC values averaged over all patients in non-cancerous and malignant peripheral zone (PZ) tissues were 1.82 +/- 0.53 x 10(-3) (mean +/- SD) and 1.38 +/- 0.52 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second, respectively (P = 0.00045, N = 17, paired t-test). The ADC values were found to be higher in the non-cancerous PZ (1.88 +/- 0.48 x 10(-3)) than in healthy or benign prostatic hyperplasia central gland (BPH-CG) region (1.62 +/- 0.41 x 10(-3)). For the normal group, the mean values were 1.91 +/- 0.46 x 10(-3) and 1.63 +/- 0.30 x 10(-3) mm(2)/second for the PZ and CG, respectively (P = 0.011, N = 7). Significant overlap exists between individual values among all tissue types. Further-more, ADC values for the same tissue type showed no statistically significant difference between the two subject groups. Conclusion: ADC is quantified in the prostate using DW-EPI. Values are lower in cancerous than in healthy PZ in patients, and in BPH-CG than PZ in volunteers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available