4.7 Article

String models of glueballs and the spectrum of SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions -: art. no. 036006

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.036006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spectrum of glueballs in 2+1 dimensions is calculated within an extended class of Isgur-Paton flux tube models and compared to lattice calculations of the low-lying SU(Ngreater than or equal to2) glueball mass spectrum. Our modifications of the model include a string curvature term and a new way of dealing with the short-distance cutoff. We find that the generic model is remarkably successful at reproducing the positive charge conjugation, C=+, sector of the spectrum. The only large (and robust) discrepancy involves the 0(-+) state, raising the interesting possibility that the lattice spin identification is mistaken and that this state is in fact 4(-+). Additionally, the Isgur-Paton model does not incorporate any mechanism for splitting C=- from C=+ (in contrast with the case in 3+1 dimensions), while the observed spectrum does show a substantial splitting. We explore several modifications of the model in an attempt to incorporate this physics in a natural way. At the qualitative level we find that this constrains our choice to the picture in which the C=+/- splitting is driven by mixing with new states built on closed loops of adjoint flux. However, a detailed numerical comparison suggests that a model incorporating an additional direct mixing between loops of opposite orientation is likely to work better, and that, in any case, a nonzero curvature term will be required. We also point out that a characteristic of any string model of glueballs is that the SU(N-->infinity) mass spectrum will consist of multiple towers of states that are scaled up copies of each other. To test this will require a lattice mass spectrum that extends to somewhat larger masses than currently available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available