4.6 Article

Reversibility of n-3 fatty acid deficiency-induced changes in dopaminergic neurotransmission in rats: critical role of developmental stage

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 1209-1219

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M200132-JLR200

Keywords

alpha-linolenic acid diet deficiency; alpha-linolenic acid diet supplementation; brain development; dopamine; docosahexaenoic acid; microdialysis; phospholipids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous investigations have shown that the lipid composition of cerebral membranes and dopaminergic neurotransmission are changed under chronic aminolenic acid diet deficiency in the rat. This study investigated whether these changes could be reversed and if the stage of brain maturation might play a role in the recovery process. The effects of reversion on the fatty acid (FA) composition and dopaminergic neurotransmission were studied in brain regions known to be affected by such deficiency (i.e., the prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens) in 2-month-old animals. Dopamine release under pharmacological stimulation was studied using a dual-probe microdialysis method. Vesicular monoamine transporters were studied using quantitative autoradiography. The reversal diet, with adequate levels of n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), was given to deficient rats at different stages of development (0, 7, 14, or 21 days of age). The results showed that when given during the lactating period, this diet was able to restore both the FA composition of brain membranes and the parameters of dopaminergic neurotransmission studied. However, when given from weaning, it allowed partial recovery of biochemical parameters but no recovery of neurochemical factors.(jlr) The occurrence of profound n-3 PUFA deficiency during the lactating period could therefore be an environmental insult leading to irreversible damage to specific brain functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available