4.6 Article

Low-temperature transverse dielectric and pyroelectric anomalies of uniaxial tungsten bronze crystals

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 1536-1543

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1491995

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low-temperature dielectric and pyroelectric properties were investigated for filled and unfilled tungsten bronze (TB) crystals, i.e., (Sr0.61Ba0.39)(5)Nb10O30, (K0.5Na0.5)(1.0)(Sr0.75Ba0.25)(4.5)Nb10O30, K5.80Li3.82Nb10.12O30, and K5.20Li2.34Nb10.88O30 with the spontaneous polarizations along the c axis at room temperature except for the last one. In all samples, transverse dielectric constant along the a axis showed a universal dielectric dispersion in the low-temperature range resembling a diffuse phase transition. Characteristic relaxation times obtained from the dielectric loss peaks followed the Arrhenius law, signifying thermal activation processes. The distribution of relaxation times seems to be caused by the distribution of activation energy, which has been successfully obtained by scaling the temperature- and frequency-dependent dielectric losses. This broadening may be attributed to the intrinsic randomness due to the charge disorder and quenched random fields caused by the unfilled structure and the off-stoichiometry of the TB compounds. Observed low-temperature dynamics were isotropic in the ab plane, and were insensitive to the poling conditions, degree of disorder, and high-temperature phase transitions. Structural phase transition accompanying a polarization tilt from the c axis toward the [110] axis, which was suggested to be the origin of the low-temperature anomalies, was not confirmed in our study. Some dynamics which are still active in the ferroelectric phase, like the concerted rotations of the oxygen octahedra, have been suggested as one of the possible origins of the observed phenomena. (C) 2002 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available