4.6 Article

Long-term effects of stream management on plant communities in two Danish lowland streams

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 481, Issue 1-3, Pages 33-45

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021296519187

Keywords

weed-cutting; dredging; macrophyte diversity; composition; lowland streams

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Submerged macrophytes grow abundantly in most shallow streams common in the cultivated lowlands of northwestern Europe. Weed-cutting has been practised for years in many of these streams to reduce the risk of flooding of adjacent land. Our objective was to quantify long-term impacts of weed-cutting on macrophyte communities in two Danish rivers. We found that the total macrophyte coverage was similar in the weed-cut and uncut reaches in the two rivers, but species richness, diversity and patch complexity were higher in the uncut reaches. The spatial distribution of macrophytes on the stream bottom was also more heterogeneous in the uncut stream reaches. We also found evidence of a strong effect of weed-cutting on macrophyte species composition. P. natans was abundant in the uncut reaches in both streams but practically eliminated in the cut reaches, despite the fact that its basic habitat requirements were met. Also, the established phase strategy of the macrophyte community was affected by weed-cutting. Species displaying characteristically ruderal traits were more abundant in the cut reaches and species with competitive abilities were only abundant in the uncut stream reaches. We suggest that important species traits in streams, where the weed is cut regularly, are associated with rapid growth and high dispersal-capacity. Our results indicate that weed-cutting can contribute significantly to a decline in species diversity in streams. To provide optimal conditions for diverse stream macrophyte communities, we therefore suggest that weed-cutting should be minimised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available