4.5 Article

Cooperative colony foundation by termite female pairs: altruism for survivorship in incipient colonies

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 167-173

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2002.3062

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine the costs and benefits of queen association in termites we examined for the first time female-female interactions in colonies founded by two unmated females. In the termite Reticulitermes speratus, females that fail to pair with males found colonies cooperatively with partner females and reproduce by parthenogenesis. We analysed the relationship between queen dominance and initial size ranking in two-queen colonies from the viewpoint of first worker brood production and weight gain. To assign parentage to offspring of two-queen colonies we used mtDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP); the results suggested that the two queens produced first worker brood equally throughout colony foundation. Furthermore, initially smaller females gained significantly more weight than initially larger females. This may have resulted from altruistic behaviour of the larger females towards the smaller ones. A simple mathematical model, which considered resource allocation and survivorship, could explain why the larger females behave altruistically towards the smaller females. We also examined the responses of females when more than two females were placed in a petri dish in the presence or absence of a male. If a partner male was present, only one female survived in the colony. In the absence of a partner male, two females, but never more than two, founded a colony cooperatively. These results show that females need a partner to found, and retain, a colony. (C) 2002 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available