4.3 Article

The structure and dynamics of young star clusters: King 16, NGC 1931, NGC 637 and NGC 189

Journal

ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 318, Issue 1-2, Pages 25-33

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-008-9888-2

Keywords

Star clusters: young; Near-infrared photometry; Color-magnitude diagrams; Pre-mainsequence stars; Initial mass function-relaxation time; 2MASS

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Department of Science and Technology (DST), India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, using 2MASS photometry, we study the structural and dynamical properties of four young star clusters viz. King 16, NGC 1931, NGC 637 and NGC 189. For the clusters King 16, NGC 1931, NGC 637 and NGC 189, we obtain the limiting radii of 7', 12', 6' and 5' which correspond to linear radii of 3.6 pc, 8.85 pc, 3.96 pc and 2.8 pc respectively. The reddening values E(B - V) obtained for the clusters are 0.85, 0.65-0.85, 0.6 and 0.53 and their true distances are 1786 pc, 3062 pc, 2270 pc and 912 pc respectively. Ages of the clusters are 6 Myr, 4 Myr, 4 Myr and 10 Myr respectively. We compare their structures, luminosity functions and mass functions (phi(M) = dN/dM proportional to M(-(1+chi))) to the parameter tau = t(age)/t(relax) to study the star formation process and the dynamical evolution of these clusters. We find that, for our sample, mass seggregation is observed in clusters or their cores only when the ages of the clusters are comparable to their relaxation times (t = 1). These results suggest mass seggregation due to dynamical effects. The values of., which characterize the overall mass functions for the clusters are 0.96 +/- 0.11, 1.16 +/- 0.18, 0.55 +/- 0.14 and 0.66 +/- 0.31 respectively. The change in chi as a function of radius is a good indicator of the dynamical state of clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available