4.6 Article

IMAGE ANALYSIS FOR COSMOLOGY: RESULTS FROM THE GREAT10 STAR CHALLENGE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 205, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/205/2/12

Keywords

atmospheric effects; cosmology: observations; methods: data analysis; techniques: image processing

Funding

  1. Royal Society
  2. Royal Astronomical Society
  3. University of Edinburgh
  4. European Research Council [24067, 240185]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  6. DFG cluster of excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  8. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-91ER4068]
  9. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
  10. EU
  11. eScience STFC Theme
  12. NASA JPL
  13. IPAC Caltech, Pasadena
  14. [SFB-Transregio 33]
  15. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I001166/1, ST/I00162X/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/J001422/1, ST/F002289/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. STFC [ST/I001166/1, ST/J001422/1, ST/F002289/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/I00162X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results from the first public blind point-spread function (PSF) reconstruction challenge, the GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Star Challenge. Reconstruction of a spatially varying PSF, sparsely sampled by stars, at non-star positions is a critical part in the image analysis for weak lensing where inaccuracies in the modeled ellipticity e and size R-2 can impact the ability to measure the shapes of galaxies. This is of importance because weak lensing is a particularly sensitive probe of dark energy and can be used to map the mass distribution of large scale structure. Participants in the challenge were presented with 27,500 stars over 1300 images subdivided into 26 sets, where in each set a category change was made in the type or spatial variation of the PSF. Thirty submissions were made by nine teams. The best methods reconstructed the PSF with an accuracy of sigma(e) approximate to 2.5 x 10(-4) and sigma(R-2)/R-2 approximate to 7.4 x 10(-4). For a fixed pixel scale, narrower PSFs were found to be more difficult to model than larger PSFs, and the PSF reconstruction was severely degraded with the inclusion of an atmospheric turbulence model (although this result is likely to be a strong function of the amplitude of the turbulence power spectrum).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available