4.7 Article

A case study of the reliability of multielectrode earth resistivity testing for geotechnical investigations in karst terrains

Journal

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 2-3, Pages 225-232

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00132-6

Keywords

multielectrode earth resistivity; geotechnical investigations; karst terrains; carbonate bedrock

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thinly mantled karst areas of northeastern Pennsylvania have been associated with a number of structural failures caused by sinkholes. Geotechnical investigations in these areas have primarily relied upon intrusive probe tests, either through borings or air-track drillings. The silty clay soils overlying the carbonate bedrock have limited the use of nonintrusive ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic methods; however, multielectrode earth resistivity testing may be a suitable method for locating subsurface features associated with sinkhole formation in these areas The case study presented in this paper concerns a site in Northampton County where sinkholes have been occurring at an accelerated rate due to the influence of construction. The bedrock at the site is located between I m and approximately 10 m below the surface. The soil is primarily a silty clay. Seventy resistivity lines using a variety of electrode and line spacings were conducted at the site. Using the data obtained from the earth resistivity tests, 17 borings were located to assess the accuracy of the resistivity results. Comparisons between boring and resistivity results demonstrate that the resistivity tests provide good information concerning the depth to the irregular surface of the bedrock. However, use of the test to locate subsurface anomalies associated with sinkhole fort-nation and to determine their size will require additional research. The paper presents the results of the study and provides recommendations for geotechnical investigation in silty clay soils overlying shallow carbonate bedrock. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available