4.4 Article

Improved glycemic control by acarbose therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients: effects on blood pressure and hormonal parameters

Journal

Publisher

ASSOC BRAS DIVULG CIENTIFICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-879X2002000800004

Keywords

type 2 diabetes mellitus; acarbose; hypertension; hyperinsulinemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 44 hypertensive type 2 diabetic subjects previously treated by diet associated or not with sulfonylurea to assess the effects of acarboseUniversidade induced glycemic control on blood pressure (BP) and hormonal parameters. Before randomization and after a 22-week treatment period (100 to 300 mg/day), the subjects were submitted to a standard meal test and to 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and had plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, lipid profile, insulin, proinsulin and leptin levels determined. Weight loss was found only in the acarbose-treated group (75.1 +/- 11.6 to 73.1 +/- 11.6 kg, P<0.01) Glycosylated hemoglobin decreased only in the acarbose group (6.4 +/- 1.7 to 5.6 +/- 1.9%, P<0.05). Fasting proinsulin decreased only in the acarbose group (23.4 +/- 19.3 to 14.3 +/- 13.6 pmol/l, P<0.05), while leptin decreased in both (placebo group: 26.3 +/- 6.1 to 23.3 +/- 9.4 and acarbose group: 25.0 +/- 5.5 to 22.7 +/- 7.9 ng/ml, P<0.05). When the subset of acarbose-treated patients who improved glycemic control was considered, significant reductions in diurnal systolic, diastolic and mean BP (102.3 +/- 6.0 to 99.0 +/- 6.6 mmHg, P<0.05) were found. Acarbose monotherapy or combined with sulfonylurea was effective in improving glycemic control in hypertensive diabetic patients. Acarbose-induced improvement in metabolic control may reduce BP in these patients. Our data did not suggest a direct action of acarbose on insulin resistance or leptin levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available