4.6 Article

SDSS DR7 WHITE DWARF CATALOG

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 204, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/204/1/5

Keywords

catalogs; magnetic fields; stars: luminosity function, mass function; surveys; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. Gemini Observatory
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  7. Max Planck Society
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. American Museum of Natural History
  10. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  11. University of Basel
  12. University of Cambridge
  13. Case Western Reserve University
  14. University of Chicago
  15. Drexel University
  16. Fermilab
  17. Institute for Advanced Study
  18. Japan Participation Group
  19. Johns Hopkins University
  20. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  21. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  22. Korean Scientist Group
  23. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  24. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  25. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  26. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  27. New Mexico State University
  28. Ohio State University
  29. University of Pittsburgh
  30. University of Portsmouth
  31. Princeton University
  32. United States Naval Observatory
  33. University of Washington
  34. NSERC Canada
  35. FQRNT Quebec
  36. FAPERGS
  37. CNPq-Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new catalog of spectroscopically confirmed white dwarf stars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 7 spectroscopic catalog. We find 20,407 white dwarf spectra, representing 19,712 stars, and provide atmospheric model fits to 14,120 DA and 1011 DB white dwarf spectra from 12,843 and 923 stars, respectively. These numbers represent more than a factor of two increase in the total number of white dwarf stars from the previous SDSS white dwarf catalogs based on DR4 data. Our distribution of subtypes varies from previous catalogs due to our more conservative, manual classifications of each star in our catalog, supplementing our automatic fits. In particular, we find a large number of magnetic white dwarf stars whose small Zeeman splittings mimic increased Stark broadening that would otherwise result in an overestimated log g if fit as a non-magnetic white dwarf. We calculate mean DA and DB masses for our clean, non-magnetic sample and find the DB mean mass is statistically larger than that for the DAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available