4.6 Article

A GODUNOV METHOD FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL RADIATION MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS BASED ON A VARIABLE EDDINGTON TENSOR

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 199, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/199/1/14

Keywords

magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); methods: numerical; radiative transfer

Funding

  1. NASA ATP [NNX11AF49G]
  2. NASA [146943, NNX11AF49G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a numerical algorithm to integrate the equations of radiation magnetohydrodynamics in multidimensions using Godunov methods. This algorithm solves the radiation moment equations in the mixed frame, without invoking any diffusion-like approximations. The moment equations are closed using a variable Eddington tensor whose components are calculated from a formal solution of the transfer equation at a large number of angles using the method of short characteristics. We use a comprehensive test suite to verify the algorithm, including convergence tests of radiation-modified linear acoustic and magnetosonic waves, the structure of radiation-modified shocks, and two-dimensional tests of photon bubble instability and the ablation of dense clouds by an intense radiation field. These tests cover a very wide range of regimes, including both optically thick and thin flows, and ratios of the radiation to gas pressure of at least 10(-4)-10(4). Across most of the parameter space, we find that the method is accurate. However, the tests also reveal there are regimes where the method needs improvement, for example when both the radiation pressure and absorption opacity are very large. We suggest modifications to the algorithm that will improve the accuracy in this case. We discuss the advantages of this method over those based on flux-limited diffusion. In particular, we find that the method is not only substantially more accurate, but often no more expensive than the diffusion approximation for our intended applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available