4.6 Article

THE MOLECULAR PROPERTIES OF GALACTIC H II REGIONS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 181, Issue 1, Pages 255-271

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/1/255

Keywords

H II regions; ISM: clouds; ISM: evolution; ISM: lines and bands; ISM: structure; radio lines: ISM

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-9800334, AST-0098562, AST-0100793]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We derive the molecular properties for a sample of 301 Galactic H II regions including 123 ultra compact (UC), 105 compact, and 73 diffuse nebulae. We analyze all sources within the BU-FCRAO Galactic Ring Survey (GRS) of (13)CO emission known to be H II regions based upon the presence of radio continuum and cm-wavelength radio recombination line emission. Unlike all previous large area coverage 13CO surveys, the GRS is fully sampled in angle and yet covers similar to 75 deg(2) of the Inner Galaxy. The angular resolution of the GRS (46 '') allows us to associate molecular gas with H II regions without ambiguity and to investigate the physical properties of this molecular gas. We find clear CO/H II morphological associations in position and velocity for similar to 80% of the nebular sample. Compact H II region molecular gas clouds are on average larger than UC clouds: 2'.2 compared to 1'.7. Compact and UC H II regions have very similar molecular properties, with similar to 5 K line intensities and similar to 4 km s(-1) line widths. The diffuse H II region molecular gas has lower line intensities, similar to 3 K, and smaller line widths, similar to 3.5 km s(-1). These latter characteristics are similar to those found for quiescent molecular clouds in the GRS. Our sample nebulae thus show evidence for an evolutionary sequence wherein small, dense molecular gas clumps associated with UC H II regions grow into older compact nebulae and finally fragment and dissipate into large, diffuse nebulae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available