4.6 Article

THE CHANDRA SURVEY OF THE COSMOS FIELD. II. SOURCE DETECTION AND PHOTOMETRY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 185, Issue 2, Pages 586-601

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/185/2/586

Keywords

methods: data analysis; surveys; X-rays: general

Funding

  1. NASA [GO7-8136A, NAS8-39073, NNX07AT02G]
  2. ASI/INAF [I/023/05/0, I/024/05/0, I/026/07/0, I/088/06, 2007/1.06.10.08]
  3. PRIN/MUR [2006-02-5203]
  4. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung/Deutsches Zentrum fur Luft und Raumfahrt
  5. Max Planck Society
  6. CONACyT [83564]
  7. PAPIIT [IN110209]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Chandra COSMOS Survey (C-COSMOS) is a large, 1.8 Ms, Chandra program that covers the central contiguous similar to 0.92 deg(2) of the COSMOS field. C-COSMOS is the result of a complex tiling, with every position being observed in up to six overlapping pointings (four overlapping pointings in most of the central similar to 0.45 deg(2) area with the best exposure, and two overlapping pointings in most of the surrounding area, covering an additional similar to 0.47 deg(2)). Therefore, the full exploitation of the C-COSMOS data requires a dedicated and accurate analysis focused on three main issues: (1) maximizing the sensitivity when the point-spread function (PSF) changes strongly among different observations of the same source (from similar to 1 arcsec up to similar to 10 arcsec half-power radius); (2) resolving close pairs; and (3) obtaining the best source localization and count rate. We present here our treatment of four key analysis items: source detection, localization, photometry, and survey sensitivity. Our final procedure consists of a two step procedure: (1) a wavelet detection algorithm to find source candidates and (2) a maximum likelihood PSF fitting algorithm to evaluate the source count rates and the probability that each source candidate is a fluctuation of the background. We discuss the main characteristics of this procedure, which was the result of detailed comparisons between different detection algorithms and photometry tools, calibrated with extensive and dedicated simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available