4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

The role of reovirus type 3 infection in an established murine model for biliary atresia

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 248-250

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-34477

Keywords

biliary atresia; reovirus; infection; aetiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim of the study: Infection of newborn Balb/c-mice with Rhesus rotavirus (RRV) leads to cholestasis and biliary atresia. In this current model, Reovirus Type 3 was investigated to ascertain whether Reovirus Type 3 causes the same or similar hepatobiliary lesions as RRV. Methods: Newborn Balb/c-mice were infected with Reovirus Type 3 Dearing and Reovirus Type 3 Abney on the first day of life. Clinical observation followed for a period of at least 10 days. Cholestatic and/or dystrophic mice were prepared and specimens were taken for histological examination. Results: Infection with RRV showed a 85% morbidity for biliary atresia as described before. Clinical disease, following an infection with Reovirus T3 Dearing, showed neurological symptoms such as ataxia, and all mice died within 3 weeks. No obstructive or atretic changes of the hepatobiliary ducts could be seen either.; macroscopically or histomorphologically. 60% of the mice having been infected with Reovirus T3 Abney showed signs of cholestasis and oily fur syndrome, but almost 15% recovered from the disease. Although the histological findings did not reveal biliary atresia, inflammation and destruction of bile ducts could be observed. Conclusion: In comparison to the RRV infection in a Balb/c-mice model, where biliary atresia could be induced, infection with Reovirus T3 in this model did not lead to biliary atresia. But Reovirus T3 Abney infection revealed inflammatory signs as described in the literature before. The question as to why different hepatotrophic viruses lead to different changes in the murine hepatobiliary tract has to be investigated in further studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available