4.6 Article

MOLECULAR CLOUDS AND CLUMPS IN THE BOSTON UNIVERSITY-FIVE COLLEGE RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY GALACTIC RING SURVEY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 182, Issue 1, Pages 131-142

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/131

Keywords

catalogs; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; ISM: clouds; ISM: molecules; molecular data

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-9800334, AST-0098562, AST-0100793, AST-0228993, AST-0507657]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Boston University-Five College Radio Astronomy Observatory (BU-FCRAO) Galactic Ring Survey (GRS) of (CO)-C-13 J = 1 -> 0 emission covers Galactic longitudes 18 degrees < l < 55 degrees.7 and Galactic latitudes vertical bar b vertical bar <= 1 degrees. Using the SEQUOIA array on the FCRAO 14 m telescope, the GRS fully sampled the (CO)-C-13 Galactic emission (46 '' angular resolution on a 22 '' grid) and achieved a spectral resolution of 0.21 km s(-1). Because the GRS uses (CO)-C-13, an optically thin tracer, rather than (CO)-C-12, an optically thick tracer, the GRS allows a much better determination of column density and also a cleaner separation of velocity components along a line of sight. With this homogeneous, fully sampled survey of (CO)-C-13 emission, we have identified 829 molecular clouds and 6124 clumps throughout the inner Galaxy using the CLUMPFIND algorithm. Here we present details of the catalog and a preliminary analysis of the properties of the molecular clouds and their clumps. Moreover, we compare clouds inside and outside of the 5 kpc ring and find that clouds within the ring typically have warmer temperatures, higher column densities, larger areas, and more clumps compared with clouds located outside the ring. This is expected if these clouds are actively forming stars. This catalog provides a useful tool for the study of molecular clouds and their embedded young stellar objects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available