4.6 Article

No periodicity revealed for an eclipsing'' ultraluminous supersoft X-ray source in M81

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 177, Issue 1, Pages 181-188

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/587551

Keywords

galaxies : individual (M81); X-rays : binaries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Luminous supersoft X-ray sources found in the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds are likely white dwarfs that steadily or cyclically burn accreted matter on their surface, which are promising Type Ia supernova progenitors. Observations of distant galaxies with Chandra and XMM-Newton have revealed supersoft sources that are generally hotter and more luminous, including some ultraluminous supersoft sources (ULSs) that are possibly intermediate-mass black holes of a few thousand solar masses. In this paper we report our X-ray spectral and timing analysis for M81-ULS 1, a ULS in the nearby spiral galaxy M81. M81-ULS 1 has been persistently supersoft in 17 Chandra ACIS observations spanning 6 years, and its spectrum can be described by either a kT(bb) approximate to 70 eV blackbody for a similar to 1.2 M-circle dot white dwarf, or a kT(in) approximate to 80 eV multicolor accretion disk for a greater than or similar to 10(3) M-circle dot intermediate-mass black hole. In two observations, the light curves exhibited dramatic flux drop/rise on timescales of 10(3) s, reminiscent of eclipse ingress/egress in eclipsing X-ray binaries. However, the exhaustive search for periodicity in the reasonable range of 50 ks to 50 days failed to reveal an orbital period. The failure to reveal any periodicity is consistent with the long period (>= 30 yr) predicted for this system given the optical identification of the secondary with an asymptotic giant star. In addition, the eclipse-like dramatic flux changes in hours are hard to explain under the white dwarf model, but can in principle be explained by disk temperature changes induced by accretion rate variations under the intermediatemass black hole model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available