4.6 Article

THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR 65 EXOPLANETS SMALLER THAN 4 EARTH RADII

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 783, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L6

Keywords

planets and satellites: composition; planets and satellites: fundamental parameters; planets and satellites: gaseous planets; planets and satellites: general; planets and satellites: terrestrial planets

Funding

  1. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1518274] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the masses and radii of 65 exoplanets smaller than 4 R-circle plus. with orbital periods shorter than 100 days. We calculate the weighted mean densities of planets in bins of 0.5 R-circle plus and identify a density maximum of 7.6 g cm(-3) at 1.4 R-circle plus. On average, planets with radii up to R-P = 1.5R(circle plus) increase in density with increasing radius. Above 1.5 R-circle plus, the average planet density rapidly decreases with increasing radius, indicating that these planets have a large fraction of volatiles by volume overlying a rocky core. Including the solar system terrestrial planets with the exoplanets below 1.5R(circle plus), we find rho(P) = 2.43 + 3.39 (R-P/R-circle plus) g cm(-3) for R-P < 1.5R(circle plus), which is consistent with rocky compositions. For 1.5 <= R-P/R-circle plus < 4, we find M-P/M-circle plus = 2.69 (R-P/R-circle plus)(0.93). The rms of planet masses to the fit between 1.5 and 4 R-circle plus is 4.3 M-circle plus with reduced chi(2) = 6.2. The large scatter indicates a diversity in planet composition at a given radius. The compositional diversity can be due to planets of a given volume (as determined by their large H/He envelopes) containing rocky cores of different masses or compositions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available